World415_DM_01
Law Document / Contract AnalysisPrompt
MLT is a CrowdStrike customer severely affected by the outage. MLT filed a lawsuit for negligence seeking to recover damages arising from the outage. Additionally, MLT successfully transferred venue to Georgia. CrowdStrike is considering moving for summary judgment on the basis that the outage does not rise to the level of gross negligence and the exculpatory clause in the contract applies (the "Motion"). Can you tell me if CrowdStrike is likely to succeed in its Motion? Reply to me with your v...
Files
snap_b17ef8a9a18b4664b06a38d24149323b Use in Your Answer
No files found for this task input snapshot.
Snapshot ID: snap_b17ef8a9a18b4664b06a38d24149323b
Gold Response
No, CrowdStrike is unlikely to succeed in its Motion because the determination of whether the degree of negligence amounts to gross negligence is typically a question of fact for a jury. As gross negligence cannot be waived by an exculpatory clause under Georgia law, the factual dispute over the degree of negligence precludes granting the Motion.
Rubric (3 criteria)
3 criteria
Traces (0)
No traces for this task
Input Analysis
- Prompt
- 92 words - 551 chars
- ~120 tokens
- Structure
- 6 sentences - 1 questions
- Ref. Files
- 9 files
- 6 pdf, 3 docx
Output Analysis
- Output Type
- Message In Console
- Response
- text - 56 words - 1 lines
- ~73 tokens
- Prompt Tokens
- 120
- Gold Tokens
- 73
- Total Tokens
- 255
- Rubric
- 3 criteria